Volume 36 Issue 3
Jun.  2022
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
LIU Huimin, ZHENG Zhongtuan, GENG Peng. Construction and demonstration of ecological environment vulnerability evaluation index system in Yangtze River Delta urban agglomerations[J]. Journal of Shanghai University of Engineering Science, 2022, 36(3): 315-323. doi: 10.12299/jsues.21-0186
Citation: LIU Huimin, ZHENG Zhongtuan, GENG Peng. Construction and demonstration of ecological environment vulnerability evaluation index system in Yangtze River Delta urban agglomerations[J]. Journal of Shanghai University of Engineering Science, 2022, 36(3): 315-323. doi: 10.12299/jsues.21-0186

Construction and demonstration of ecological environment vulnerability evaluation index system in Yangtze River Delta urban agglomerations

doi: 10.12299/jsues.21-0186
  • Received Date: 2021-09-09
  • Accepted Date: 2022-01-04
  • Publish Date: 2022-06-30
  • Considering the regional differences of the Yangtze River Delta urban agglomeration, the ecological environment vulnerability assessment differences index system of the Yangtze River Delta urban agglomeration was constructed based on the sustainable development pressure-state-response (PSR) model, and then the maximum relevance and minimum redundancy (mRMR) algorithm, set pair analysis, entropy weight method and so on were comprehensively used. Meanwhile, the vulnerability level of the ecological environment was comprehensively measured and analyzed. The empirical results show that: 1) The index system contains key basic indexes and regional characteristic indexes can reflect the vulnerability of the Yangtze River Delta urban agglomeration. 2) The overall level distribution of the ecological environment vulnerability index of the Yangtze River Delta urban agglomeration is relatively balanced. 3) There are obvious differences in air pollution, population pressure and environmental protection among provinces and cities in the region, among which Shanghai and Hefei have the largest population pressure; Anhui province has the worst air pollution; Environmental protection is the weakest in Jiangsu.

  • loading
  • [1]
    张学玲, 余文波, 蔡海生, 等. 区域生态环境脆弱性评价方法研究综述[J] . 生态学报,2018,38(16):5970 − 5981.
    [2]
    乔青, 高吉喜, 王维, 等. 生态脆弱性综合评价方法与应用[J] . 环境科学研究,2008(5):117 − 123.
    [3]
    孙平军, 修春亮, 王忠芝. 基于PSE模型的矿业城市生态脆弱性的变化研究:以辽宁阜新为例[J] . 经济地理,2010,30(8):1354 − 1359.
    [4]
    蔡海生, 张学玲, 周丙娟. 生态环境脆弱性动态评价的理论与方法[J] . 中国水土保持,2009(2):18 − 22. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0941.2009.02.008
    [5]
    王婷, 袁增伟. 基于“压力-状态-响应”模型的江苏省环境绩效评估研究[J] . 中国环境管理,2017,9(3):59 − 65.
    [6]
    黄小卜, 熊建华, 王英辉, 等. 基于PSR模型的广西生态建设环境绩效评估研究[J] . 中国人口·资源与环境,2016,26(S1):168 − 171.
    [7]
    林金煌, 胡国建, 祁新华, 等. 闽三角城市群生态环境脆弱性及其驱动力[J] . 生态学报,2018,38(12):4155 − 4166.
    [8]
    刘木生, 张其海, 林联盛, 等. 基于GIS的江西省脆弱生态环境时空评价[J] . 江西科学,2008(5):803 − 807,811. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3679.2008.05.038
    [9]
    姚昆, 周兵, 李小菊, 等. 基于AHP-PCA熵权模型的大渡河流域中上游地区生态环境脆弱性评价[J] . 水土保持研究,2019,26(5):265 − 271.
    [10]
    唐斌. 地方政府生态文明建设绩效评估的体系构建与机制创新研究[D]. 湘潭: 湘潭大学, 2017.
    [11]
    刘凤朝, 潘雄锋, 施定国. 基于集对分析法的区域自主创新能力评价研究[J] . 中国软科学,2005(11):83 − 91. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-9753.2005.11.012
    [12]
    钱敏蕾, 李响, 徐艺扬, 等. 特大型城市生态文明建设评价指标体系构建:以上海市为例[J] . 复旦学报(自然科学版),2015,54(4):389 − 397.
    [13]
    SHANNON C E, WEAVER W. The mathematical theory of communication[J] . Philosophical Review,1949,60(3):144.
    [14]
    邓伟, 袁兴中, 孙荣, 等. 基于遥感的北方农牧交错带生态脆弱性评价[J] . 环境科学与技术,2016,39(11):174 − 181.
    [15]
    姚昆, 张存杰, 何磊, 等. 川西北高原区生态环境脆弱性评价[J] . 水土保持研究,2020,27(4):349 − 355,362.
    [16]
    张德君, 高航, 杨俊, 等. 基于GIS的南四湖湿地生态脆弱性评价[J] . 资源科学,2014,36(4):874 − 882.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(6)  / Tables(4)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (174) PDF downloads(43) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return