Volume 40 Issue 2
Jun.  2026
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
HU Mingchen, WU Changshui. Research on reliability evaluation method for sensor signals in data reinjection system[J]. Journal of Shanghai University of Engineering Science, 2026, 40(2): 167-173. doi: 10.12299/jsues.24-0383
Citation: HU Mingchen, WU Changshui. Research on reliability evaluation method for sensor signals in data reinjection system[J]. Journal of Shanghai University of Engineering Science, 2026, 40(2): 167-173. doi: 10.12299/jsues.24-0383

Research on reliability evaluation method for sensor signals in data reinjection system

doi: 10.12299/jsues.24-0383
  • Received Date: 2024-12-18
    Available Online: 2026-08-19
  • Publish Date: 2026-06-30
  • The test system for an intelligent driving system is a research priority of intelligent driving, where the perception layer sensor signal used for reinjection must be reliable and effective. To address the insufficient objectivity of horizontal comparison using a single error index, a reliability evaluation method for sensor signal reinjection based on quantification of margins and uncertainties (QMU) was proposed. Based on the core principle of QMU, a reliability evaluation pathway was first established by incorporating evaluation thresholds. Subsequently, a comprehensive fuzzy evaluation system and process, integrating the order relation method (G1) and an uncertainty scale factor, were developed for sensors in the data reinjection system, from which the test results were derived. Finally, a test scenario was built in the simulation software, and the reinjection signals of the millimeter-wave radar and LiDAR received by the domain controller were evaluated. The results show that for the measured data, the characteristic values of the LiDAR maximum elevation error, XY-plane error, X-plane error and Y-plane error are 2.89, 0.45, 1.063 and 0.65, respectively, with a comprehensive evaluation result of 2.82. The characteristic values of the millimeter-wave radar for ranging, angle measurement and velocity measurement are 2.1429, 1.5306 and 1.1705. The comprehensive evaluation result obtained by the proposed method is 1.467. This method can overcome the limitations of horizontal comparison of a single index, and realize the in-depth evaluation and objective quantification of the sensor reinjection system.
  • loading
  • [1]
    Ibarguengoytia P H, Sucar L E, Vadera S. Real time intelligent sensor validation[J] . IEEE Power Engineering Review, 2001, 21(9): 63 − 64. doi: 10.1109/59.962425
    [2]
    Zhang J, Ren F Y, Gao S, et al. Dynamic routing for data integrity and delay differentiated services in wireless sensor networks[J] . IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 2015, 14(2): 328 − 343. doi: 10.1109/TMC.2014.2313576
    [3]
    Natan O, Miura J. Towards compact autonomous driving perception with balanced learning and multi-sensor fusion[J] . IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2022, 23(9): 16249 − 16266.
    [4]
    Braun H, Gerke M, Marchthaler R. Safety in autonomous driving-evaluation by maximum entropy[J] . ATZ Worldwide, 2021, 123(3): 62 − 67.
    [5]
    Son T D, Bhave A, Van der Auweraer H. Simulation-based testing framework for autonomous driving development[C] //2019 IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics. Ilmenau: IEEE, 2019: 576 − 583.
    [6]
    Chen Y, Chen S T, Xiao T, et al. Mixed test environment-based vehicle-in-the-loop validation-a new testing approach for autonomous vehicles[C] //2020 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium. Las Vegas: IEEE, 2020: 1283 − 1289.
    [7]
    Magosi Z F, Wellershaus C, Tihanyi V R, et al. Evaluation methodology for physical radar perception sensor models based on on-road measurements for the testing and validation of automated driving[J] . Energies, 2022, 15(7): 2545.
    [8]
    陈君毅, 李如冰, 邢星宇, 等. 自动驾驶车辆智能性评价研究综述[J] . 同济大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 47(12): 1785 − 1790, 1824.
    [9]
    朱冰, 张培兴, 赵健, 等. 基于场景的自动驾驶汽车虚拟测试研究进展[J] . 中国公路学报, 2019, 32(6): 1 − 19.
    [10]
    魏子茹, 卢延辉, 王鹏宇, 等. 基于CRITIC法的灰色关联理论在无人驾驶车辆测试评价中的应用[J] . 机械工程学报, 2021, 57(12): 99 − 108.
    [11]
    李茹, 马育林, 田欢, 等. 基于熵值和G1法的自动驾驶车辆综合智能定量评价[J] . 汽车工程, 2020, 42(10): 1327 − 1334.
    [12]
    李威. 面向智能驾驶的交通场景理解方法研究[D] . 长春: 吉林大学, 2021.
    [13]
    Hu S C, Fan H W, Gao B, et al. An image-based approach of task-driven driving scene categorization[PP/OL] . V1. (2021-03-10)[2024-06-18] . https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2103.05920.
    [14]
    Wallstrom T C. Quantification of margins and uncertainties: a probabilistic framework[J] . Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2011, 96(9): 1053 − 1062. doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2011.01.001
    [15]
    林国庆, 逯超, 韩龙飞, 等. 汽车自动紧急制动系统行人测试与评价方法[J] . 汽车安全与节能学报, 2020, 11(3): 296 − 304.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(4)  / Tables(5)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (62) PDF downloads(5) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return