小端面冲击连接效应的若干问题讨论

武琪昌; 何建萍

小端面冲击连接效应的若干问题讨论

武琪昌,
何建萍^,

上海工程技术大学材料工程学院, 上海201620

详细信息

作者简介:
武琪昌（1996−），男，在读硕士，研究方向为微束等离子弧焊及冲击焊. E-mail: wwuqichang@163.com

通讯作者:
何建萍（1964−），女，教授，博士，研究方向为微束等离子弧焊及冲击焊. E-mail: janejphe@sues.edu.cn

中图分类号: TG456.9
计量
- 文章访问数: 599
- HTML全文浏览量: 644
- PDF下载量: 1571
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2020-12-31
- 刊出日期: 2022-02-23

Discussion on some problems of small face impact bonding effect

WU Qichang,
HE Jianping^,

School of Materials Engineering, Shanghai University of Engineering Science, Shanghai 201620, China

摘要

摘要: 碰撞冲击连接凭借其优异的连接性能得到广泛关注. 为探讨小端面冲击连接效应，首先从冲击焊的连接界面形貌出发，探讨冲击连接界面形貌对力学性能的影响，指出波浪形界面对可靠接头的重要性，并从大端面冲击连接的过程进一步讨论波浪形界面的形成机理，在此基础上讨论小端面冲击连接的波浪形界面形成机理，指出人为设置的带倾角的碰撞是形成小端面波浪形界面的前提，同时提出解决小端面带倾角碰撞所出现的非对称问题的有效方法是将复板连接端面改为锥形端面.
- 小端面冲击连接 /
- 界面形貌 /
- 波浪形界面
Abstract: Impact bonding has attracted much attention due to its excellent performance. In order to understand impact bonding effect with small face, the interface morphology by impact welding was investigated, the affecting of interface morphology on mechanical properties of welds was discussed, and it is indicated that the wavy interface is important for a reliable weld. In addition, based on bonding process of impact welding workpiece with large face, the formation mechanism of wavy interface was further analyzed. On this basis, the formation mechanism of wavy interface produced for impact welding workpiece with small face was discussed. It is indicated that an artificially set collision angle is necessary to form a wavy interface. Moreover, it is proposed that the effective method to solve the asymmetric problem occurred in impact welding workpiece with small face is to change the bonding surface of flying plate with conical bonding face.
- impact bonding effect with small face /
- interface morphology /
- wavy interface

HTML全文

图 1 不同强度基板焊接试样界面^[13]

Figure 1. Interface of different strength base plate welding samples^[13]

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 爆炸焊界面连接过程

Figure 2. Interface connection process of explosive welding

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 磁脉冲焊焊接界面连接过程

Figure 3. Welding interface connection process of magnetic pulse welding

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 电磁冲击焊界面连接过程

Figure 4. Interface connection process of electromagnetic impact welding

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 界面波形成过程^[41]

Figure 5. Interface wave formation process^[41]

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 焊接材料碰撞冲击示意图

Figure 6. Impact diagram of welding material

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 7 小端面冲击连接的倾斜碰撞过程

Figure 7. Oblique impact process of small end impact connection

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 8 植柱型旋转碰撞冲击连接试样

Figure 8. Samples of stud-type spin impact bonding

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 9 小端面冲击连接的对称性碰撞过程

Figure 9. Symmetric impact process of small end impact connection

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

参考文献(50)

[1]	王耀华. 金属板材爆炸焊接研究与实践[M]. 北京: 国防工业出版社, 2007.
[2]	GENG H H, SUN L Q, LI G Y, et al. Fatigue fracture properties of magnetic pulse welded dissimilar Al-Fe lap joints[J] . International Journal of Fatigue,2018,121:146 − 154.
[3]	聂鹏, 侯中志, 王哲峰, 等. 铝钛金属板电磁脉冲焊接试验研究[J] . 机械设计与制造,2018(7):90 − 92,96. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3997.2018.07.026
[4]	AKBARI-MOUSAVI S, BARRETT L M, AL-HASSANI S. Explosive welding of metal plates[J] . Journal of Materials Processing Technology,2008,202(1/2/3):224 − 239. doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.09.028
[5]	YANG M, MA H H, SHEN Z W. Study on explosive welding of Ta2 titanium to Q235 steel using colloid water as a covering for explosives[J] . Journal of Materials Research and Technology,2019,8(6):5572 − 5580. doi: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2019.09.025
[6]	王小绪, 何勇. 爆炸焊接参数对钛钢复合板界面波的影响[J] . 南京理工大学学报,2013,37(2):215 − 218.
[7]	王爽. 爆炸复合板焊接接头组织及性能研究[D]. 沈阳: 沈阳理工大学, 2014.
[8]	李芮宇, 孙宇新, 付艳恕, 等. 铝–铝爆炸焊接界面波形成与特征[J] . 焊接学报,2017,38(5):92 − 107. doi: 10.12073/j.hjxb.20170520
[9]	陈凯, 马勇, 何尧, 等. C276/304L爆炸焊接复合板界面熔化区微观组织及形成过程[J] . 精密成形工程,2020,12(2):67 − 71. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-6457.2020.02.011
[10]	BEN-ARTZY A, STERN A, FRAGE N, et al. Wave formation mechanism in magnetic pulse welding[J] . International Journal of Impact Engineering,2010,37(4):397 − 404. doi: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2009.07.008
[11]	KORE S D, DATE P P, KULKARNI S V. Effect of process parameters on electromagnetic impact welding of aluminum sheets[J] . International Journal of Impact Engineering,2007,34(8):1327 − 1341. doi: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2006.08.006
[12]	ATHAR M, TOLAMINEJAD B. Weldability window and the effect of interface morphology on the properties of Al/Cu/Al laminated composites fabricated by explosive welding[J] . Materials & design,2015,86(5):516 − 525.
[13]	曾翔宇, 李晓杰, 曹景祥, 等. 材料强度对爆炸焊接结合界面的影响[J] . 爆炸与冲击,2019,39(5):139 − 145.
[14]	杨文武. Al/Mg/Al复合板的制备及其界面行为与性能的研究[D]. 太原: 太原理工大学, 2019.
[15]	姜丽红, 郭正华, 杨扬. ZK60镁合金绝热剪切行为及损伤断裂研究[J] . 塑性工程学报,2020,27(4):125 − 131. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-2012.2020.04.017
[16]	POURABBAS M, ABDOLLAH-ZADEH A, SARVARI M, et al. Investigation of structural and mechanical properties of magnetic pulse welded dissimilar aluminum alloys[J] . Journal of Manufacturing Processes,2019,37:292 − 304. doi: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2018.12.002
[17]	PATRA S, ARORA K S, SHOME M, et al. Interface characteristics and performance of magnetic pulse welded copper-Steel tubes[J] . Journal of Materials Processing Technology,2017,245:278 − 286. doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2017.03.001
[18]	陶聪, 陆明, 李剑斌. CLF-1钢爆炸焊接接头界面组织及力学性能研究[J] . 兵器装备工程学报,2019,40(11):213 − 216. doi: 10.11809/bqzbgcxb2019.11.042
[19]	RAJANI H, MOUSAVI S. The effect of explosive welding parameters on metallurgical and mechanical interfacial features of Inconel 625/plain carbon steel bimetal plate[J] . Materials Science & Engineering A,2012,556:454 − 464.
[20]	SARVARI M, ABDOLLAH-ZADEH A, NAFFAKH-MOOSAVY H, et al. Investigation of Collision Surfaces and Weld Interface in Magnetic Pulse Welding of Dissimilar Al/Cu Sheets[J] . Journal of Manufacturing Processes,2019,45(2):356 − 367.
[21]	HENRYK, PAUL, WOJCIECH, et al. The Effect of Interface Morphology on the Electro-Mechanical Properties of Ti/Cu Clad Composites Produced by Explosive Welding[J] . Metallurgical and Materials Transactions,2020,51(2):750 − 766. doi: 10.1007/s11661-019-05537-x
[22]	VERENA, PSYK, CHRISTIAN, et al. Process analysis for magnetic pulse welding of similar and dissimilar material sheet metal joints[J] . Procedia Engineering,2017,207:353 − 358. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.10.787
[23]	ZENG X Y, WANG Y X, LI X Q, et al. Effect of inert gas-shielding on the interface and mechanical properties of Mg/Al explosive welding composite plate[J] . Elsevier Ltd,2019,45:166 − 175.
[24]	张楠. 铝/镁合金爆炸焊接层状复合材料界面行为的研究[D]. 太原: 太原理工大学, 2015.
[25]	CUI Y, LIU D, FAN M Y, et al. Microstructure and mechanical properties of TA1/3A21 composite plate fabricated via explosive welding[J] . Materials Science and Technology,2020,36(4):1 − 9.
[26]	曾翔宇, 李晓杰, 王小红, 等. 爆炸焊接波状界面的形成和发展[J] . 稀有金属材料与工程,2020,49(6):1977 − 1983.
[27]	孙伟, 李晓杰, 闫鸿浩, 等. 水下爆炸焊接制备NiTi合金与铜箔复合板[J] . 焊接学报,2012,33(10):63 − 66,116.
[28]	崔庆丰, 惠虎, 王昊旸, 等. 冲击功与断裂韧度经验关系式对Q345R钢的适用性[J] . 机械工程材料,2015,39(12):84 − 90. doi: 10.11973/jxgccl201512020
[29]	王建民, 朱锡, 刘润泉. 爆炸焊接界面波形参数的影响因素[J] . 北京科技大学学报,2008,30(6):636 − 639. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-053X.2008.06.012
[30]	缪广红, 马雷鸣, 李雪交, 等. 装药方式对铜/钢爆炸焊接界面波的影响及波形成机理[J] . 高压物理学报,2020,34(2):126 − 134.
[31]	闫建文, 雷方超, 俞祺洋, 等. 炸药量对爆炸焊接界面波影响的数值模拟[J] . 工程爆破,2018,24(6):10 − 17. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7051.2018.06.002
[32]	付艳恕, 王震. 爆炸焊接304/Q245复合钢界面结构及剪切行为各向异性[J] . 稀有金属材料与工程,2018,47(8):2458 − 2464.
[33]	LIU L L, JIA Y F, XUAN F Z. Gradient effect in the waved interfacial layer of 304L/533B bimetallic plates induced by explosive welding[J] . Materials Science and Engineering: A,2017,704:493 − 502.
[34]	袁伟. 汽车车身铝钢金属板件磁脉冲焊接工艺研究[D]. 长沙: 湖南大学, 2017.
[35]	YAN Z, XIAO A, CUI X, et al. Magnetic pulse welding of aluminum to steel tubes using a field-shaper with multiple seams[J]. Journal of Manufacturing Processes, 2021, 65(1–4): 214-227.
[36]	ANISIMOV A G, MALI V I. Magnetic pulse welding of different metal sheets[J] . Materials Today: Proceedings,2019,16:151 − 155. doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2019.05.240
[37]	KORE S D, DATE P P, KULKAMI S V. Electromagnetic impact welding of aluminum to stainless steel sheets[J] . Journal of Materials Processing Technology,2008,208(1-3):486 − 493. doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2008.01.039
[38]	KORE, IMBERT, WORSWICK, et al. Electromagnetic impact welding of Mg to Al sheets[J] . Science and Technology of Welding and Joining,2009,14(6):549 − 553. doi: 10.1179/136217109X449201
[39]	SONG J W, PARK J J, LEE G J, et al. Effect of impact velocity on interface characteristics of HT-9 steel joints fabricated by magnetic pulse welding[J] . Metals and Materials International,2020,26(3):360 − 369. doi: 10.1007/s12540-019-00510-0
[40]	曹亚明, 杨尚磊, 夏明许, 等. 铝-铝电磁脉冲焊接技术及其机理研究[J] . 热加工工艺,2020,49(9):50 − 53,58.
[41]	BAHRANI A S, BLACK T J, CROSSLAN B. The mechanics of wave formation in explosive welding[J]. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A: Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 1967, 296(1445): 123-136.
[42]	MURR L E, NIOU C S, GARCIA E P, et al. Comparison of jetting-related microstructures associated with hypervelocity impact crater formation in cooper targets and cooper shaped charges[J] . Materials Science and Engineering: A,1997,222(2):118 − 132. doi: 10.1016/S0921-5093(96)10518-9
[43]	KOLSKY H. Stress waves in solids[J] . Journal of Sound and Vibration,1964,1(1):88 − 110. doi: 10.1016/0022-460X(64)90008-2
[44]	HE J, SIROIS D, LI S, et al. Ballistic impact welding of copper to low carbon steel[J] . Journal of Materials Processing Technology,2016,232:165 − 174. doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2016.01.029
[45]	POURABBAS M, ABDOLLAH-ZADEH A, SARVARI M, et al. Role of collision angle during dissimilar Al/Cu magnetic pulse welding[J] . Science and Technology of Welding & Joining,2020:1 − 7.
[46]	汤柳磊. 植柱型旋转碰撞冲击连接工艺及界面特征[D]. 上海: 上海工程技术大学, 2019.
[47]	李晨, 胡渊, 张云飞. 螺柱焊脱焊缺陷分析及优化方案[J] . 汽车工艺师,2020(7):38 − 41. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-657X.2020.07.012
[48]	李冠群, 张泽志, 潘晓刚. 螺柱焊技术稳定性研究在装焊车间的应用[J] . 设备管理与维修,2019(7):35 − 38.
[49]	HATTINGH D G, BULBRING D, ELS-BOTES A, et al. Process parameter influence on performance of friction taper stud welds in AISI 4140 steel[J] . Materials and Design,2011,32(6):3421 − 3430. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2011.02.001
[50]	张彭, 陈国强, 魏普, 等. 螺柱焊缺陷分析[J] . 汽车工程师,2015(6):57 − 59. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-6546.2015.06.014