Influence of willingness to accept fashion sharing in context of sustainable development
-
摘要: 以时装共享为研究对象,在文献梳理的基础上,构建时装共享影响因素和接受意愿理论模型。基于调查数据,采用因子和回归分析法,验证各因素间的关系和影响。研究表明:经济利益、时尚参与度、自我愉悦体验、社会投射、过去的可持续行为、共享服务均正向影响时装共享接受意愿;感知风险不具有中介作用;感知价值在时装共享影响因素与共享意愿中有正向中介作用;性别在经济利益、自我愉悦体验与时装共享接受意愿之间存在正向调节作用。研究结论为时装共享市场发展提供实践启示。Abstract: Taking fashion sharing as the research object, a theoretical model of fashion sharing influencing factors and acceptance willingness was constructed on the basis of literature review. Based on the questionnaire survey data, factor and regression analysis were used to verify the relationship and influence. The study shows that economic benefits, fashion participation, self-pleasure experience, social projection, past sustainable behaviors, and shared services all affect the willingness to accept fashion sharing positively; perceived risk does not play a mediating role, and perceived value has a positive impact on factors influencing fashion sharing and willingness to share. Gender has a positive moderating effect between economic interests, self-pleasure experience and willingness to accept fashion sharing. The research conclusions can provide practical inspiration for the development of fashion sharing market.
-
Key words:
- fashion sharing /
- perceived value /
- perceived risk /
- influencing factors /
- willingness to accept
-
表 1 测量指标
Table 1. Measurement indicators
维度 题项 经济效益X1 在购买时装时,我总是尽量少花钱以获得最大的质量 当我购买时装时,我喜欢确保物有所值 当我购买时装时,我通常会比较常购品牌的价格信息 共享时装将为我提供我所寻找的经济利益 时尚参与度X2 使用最新的时尚服装产品对我来说很重要 当我必须在两者之间做出选择时,我更喜欢时尚而不是舒适 我喜欢跟上时尚服装产品的最新趋势 时髦的时尚服装产品对我来说意义重大 自我愉悦体验X3 共享时装让我在生活中有更多体验 共享到时装让我心情舒畅 共享时装给了我很多乐趣 我认为共享平台上的时装消费是一种享受 社会投射X4 我想通过共享的时装来获得他人的赞赏 我想通过共享的时装给人留下深刻印象 我想通过共享的时装体验不同的生活方式 我想通过共享的时装来提升外在符号 过去的可持续行为X5 当我厌倦了旧的东西时,我会改造它来得到一个新的东西 我会和其他人交换衣服 我寻找我现有时装的不同穿着方式的信息 共享服务X6 我认为共享时装的配饰搭配服务很重要 我认为共享时装的专业推荐服务很重要 我认为共享时装的卫生服务很重要 我认为共享时装的换租服务很重要 感知风险Z1 我担心共享的时装可能达不到预期效果(例如质量、尺寸) 共享的时装与购买的时装不符时,我可能会感到失去自尊心或者失望 我担心共享的时装可能对身体产生负面影响 如果共享的时装不符合预期,我会感到来自朋友或家人的压力 感知价值Z2 我认为共享的时装符合我的需求很重要 我认为共享的时装符合我的预期很重要 我认为共享的时装的价格合理很重要 我认为共享的时装给我的独特感受很重要 共享接受意愿Y 我愿意共享时装 我会选择共享时装 我会向朋友推荐共享时装 表 2 多元回归分析结果
Table 2. Multiple regression analysis results
因子 Y回归(1) Z1回归(2) Y回归(3) Y回归(4) Z2回归(5) Y回归(6) Y回归(7) X1 0.428** (9.572) 0.388** (8.249) — 0.375** (6.948) 0.325** (6.339) — 0.303** (6.643) X2 0.350** (7.818) 0.374** (7.937) — 0.299** (5.599) 0.312** (6.088) — 0.229** (5.074) X3 0.201** (4.484) 0.267** (5.678) — 0.164** (3.334) 0.383** (7.467) — 0.053 (1.112) X4 0.445** (9.938) 0.543** (11.528) — 0.370** (5.999) 0.464** (9.045) — 0.266** (5.261) X5 0.295** (6.586) 0.124** (2.641) — 0.278** (6.101) 0.203** (3.958) — 0.216** (5.100) X6 0.287** (6.405) 0.108* (2.288) — 0.272** (6.008) 0.137** (2.680) — 0.234** (5.659) Z1 — — 0.703** (12.031) 0.137 (1.738) — — — Z2 — — — — — 0.776** (14.962) 0.387** (5.880) R² 0.713 0.683 0.494 0.719 0.624 0.602 0.770 F 59.335 51.398 144.740 52.008 39.610 223.854 67.741 注:表中没有报告常数项的回归系数;**、*分别为1%、5%的显著水平。 表 3 性别调节效应回归分析结果
Table 3. Gender-adjusted regression analysis results
因子 Y回归(1) Y回归(8) Y回归(9) Y回归(10) Y回归(11) Y回归(12) Y回归(13) X1 0.428** (9.572) 0.538** (9.214) 0.436** (9.561) 0.440**(10.007) 0.430** (9.597) 0.426** (9.492) 0.422** (9.219) X2 0.350** (7.818) 0.374** (8.403) 0.389** (6.181) 0.346** (7.900) 0.355** (7.883) 0.347** (7.713) 0.350** (7.800) X3 0.201** (4.484) 0.190** (4.327) 0.202** (4.507) 0.102 (1.809) 0.191** (4.170) 0.199** (4.430) 0.200** (4.460) X4 0.445** (9.938) 0.442** (10.101) 0.441** (9.799) 0.418** (9.334) 0.394 (5.876) 0.437** (9.536) 0.440** (9.711) X5 0.295** (6.586) 0.287** (6.558) 0.292** (6.485) 0.301** (6.882) 0.305** (6.654) 0.331** (5.113) 0.303** (6.526) X6 0.287** (6.405) 0.312** (6.993) 0.287** (6.404) 0.284** (6.491) 0.280** (6.186) 0.277** (5.972) 0.255 (3.942) X1 × M1 — -0.170** (-2.832) — — — — — X2 × M1 — — -0.056 (-0.884) — — — — X3 × M1 — — — 0.160** (2.787) — — — X4 × M1 — — — — 0.071 (1.025) — — X5 × M1 — — — — — -0.052 (-0.772) — X6 × M1 — — — — — — 0.046 (0.694) R² 0.713 0.729 0.715 0.728 0.716 0.715 0.714 F 59.335 54.501 50.893 54.374 51.026 50.800 50.742 注:表中没有报告常数项的回归系数;**、*分别为1%、5%的显著水平。 -
[1] 中国国际经济交流中心, 美国哥伦比亚大学地球研究院, 阿里研究院. 中国可持续发展评价报告(2020)[M]. 北京: 社会科学文献出版社, 2020. [2] 罗明宇, 方倩, 胡守忠. 服装业“共享定制”运作模式采纳的影响因素研究[J] . 丝绸,2020,57(1):43 − 49. [3] 尹文晶. 共享经济模式在服装行业发展现状探究[J] . 时代经贸,2018(26):42 − 43. doi: 10.19463/j.cnki.sdjm.2018.26.017 [4] 张凌青, 刘娜. 共享服装消费者分析[J] . 商场现代化,2019(1):16 − 17. doi: 10.14013/j.cnki.scxdh.2019.01.009 [5] 李蓉, 范紫菱. 共享经济下的服装共享存在问题及对策研究[J] . 太原城市职业技术学院学报,2018(5):38 − 39. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-0046.2018.05.014 [6] 李蕊. 共享经济环境下感知风险对消费者行为的影响研究[D]. 西安: 西安工程大学, 2019. [7] TUSSYADIAH, LIS P. Factors of satisfaction and intention to use peer-to-peer accommodation[J] . International Journal of Hospitality Management,2016,55:70 − 80. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhm.2016.03.005 [8] EDBRING E G, LEHNER M, MONT O. Exploring consumer attitudes to alternative models of consumption: motivations and barriers[J] . Journal of Cleaner Production,2016,123:5 − 15. [9] 钱珍瑛. 我国婚纱市场的顾客消费体验研究[D]. 上海: 东华大学, 2014. [10] 孟虎, 马骥, 杨以雄, 等. 水标签服装购买态度与消费行为意愿影响因素[J] . 毛纺科技,2017,45(7):72 − 76. doi: 10.19333/j.mfkj.2016120310705 [11] 任艳如, 王革非. 婚纱消费者购买偏好及影响因素分析: 以北京地区女性为例[J] . 丝绸,2020,57(4):62 − 67. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7003.2020.04.011 [12] 曾小桥. 共享经济环境下消费者选择共享住宿的影响因素及影响机理研究[D]. 成都: 四川师范大学, 2020. [13] 邓瑀. 消费者态度对共享单车消费意愿的影响机理[D]. 南宁: 广西大学, 2019. [14] ROOS D, HAHN R. Understanding collaborative consumption: An extension of the theory of planned behavior with value-based personal norms[J] . Journal of Business Ethics,2019,158(3):679 − 697. doi: 10.1007/s10551-017-3675-3 [15] HAMARI J, SJKLINT M, UKKONEN A. The sharing economy: Why people participate in collaborative consumption[J] . Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology,2016,67(9):2047 − 2059. doi: 10.1002/asi.23552 [16] O'CASS A, MCEWEN H. Exploring consumer status and conspicuous consumption[J] . Journal of Consumer Behaviour,2004,4(1):25 − 39. doi: 10.1002/cb.155 [17] 阮氏云. 基于越南市场的企业声誉与顾客公民行为的关系研究[D]. 长沙: 湖南大学, 2016. [18] WITTKOWSKI S K. The burdens of ownership: reasons for preferring renting[J] . Managing Service Quality,2010,20(2):176 − 191. doi: 10.1108/09604521011027598 [19] TSAI S. Impact of Personal orientation on luxury-brand purchase value: An international investigation[J] . International Journal of Market Research,2005,47(4):427 − 452. doi: 10.1177/147078530504700403 [20] 罗旭东. 基于用户感知价值视角下共享出行平台用户忠诚度的影响因素研究[D]. 金华: 浙江师范大学, 2019. [21] 李悦, 贾明霞. 共享单车用户规范使用行为的形成机制研究: 整合S-O-R理论和自我决定理论[J] . 情报探索,2021(8):61 − 70. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-8095.2021.08.008 [22] MA R, CHERIAN J, TSAI W-H, SIAL M, HOU L, LVAREZ-OTERO S. The relationship of corporate social responsibility on digital platforms, electronic word-of-mouth, and consumer-company identification: An application of social identity theory[J] . Sustainability,2021,13(9):4700. doi: 10.3390/su13094700 [23] KHARE A. Antecedents to fashion clothing involvement: Role of global self-identity, cosmopolitanism, and normative influence[J] . Journal of Global Fashion Marketing,2014,5(1):39 − 59. doi: 10.1080/20932685.2013.856099 [24] 杜玉珍, 赵京. 顾客感知价值对品牌至爱的影响: 基于消费者信任的中介作用[J] . 商业经济研究,2021(19):83 − 87. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-5863.2021.19.021 [25] JAIN S. Factors affecting sustainable luxury purchase behavior: A conceptual framework[J] . Journal of International Consumer Marketing,2019,31(2):1 − 17. [26] JANG J, KO E, CHUN E. A study of a social content model for sustainable development in the fast fashion industry[J] . Journal of Global Fashion Marketing,2012,3(2):61 − 70. doi: 10.1080/20932685.2012.10593108 [27] STERN P C, DIETZ T, ABEL T. A value-belief-norm theory of support for social movements: The case of environmentalism[J] . Human Ecology Review,1999,6(2):81 − 97. [28] KHARE A. Influence of green self-identity, past environmental behaviour and income on Indian consumers' environmentally friendly behaviour[J] . Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science,2015,25(4):379 − 395. doi: 10.1080/21639159.2015.1073423 [29] SCHULTZ P W. Values and their Relationship to environmental concern and conservation behavior[J] . Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology,2005,36(4):457 − 475. doi: 10.1177/0022022105275962 [30] 洪礼敏. 零售商店环境可持续行为对消费者商店支持的影响研究[D]. 长沙: 湖南大学, 2017. [31] YOUNG W, HWANG K, MCDONALD S, OATES C J. Sustainable consumption: Green consumer behaviour when purchasing products[J] . Sustainable Development,2010,18(1):20 − 31. [32] FLEURA B, ECKHARDT G M. Access-based consumption: The case of car sharing[J] . Journal of Consumer Research,2012,39(4):881 − 898. doi: 10.1086/666376 [33] TEO T, YEONG Y D. Assessing the consumer decision process in the digital marketplace[J] . Omega,2003,31(5):349 − 363. doi: 10.1016/S0305-0483(03)00055-0 [34] PARK H, ARMSTRONG C J. Will "no-ownership" work for apparel?: Implications for apparel retailers[J] . Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services,2019,47:66 − 73. doi: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2018.10.012 [35] 寇小萱, 卜祥峰. 在线定制旅游产品创新对消费者购买意愿的影响: 基于感知风险的视角[J] . 中北大学学报(社会科学版),2021,37(2):65 − 71. [36] 李丹, 唐玲艳, 李旦. 共享汽车持续使用意愿影响因素研究: 基于感知理论[J] . 时代汽车,2021(4):4 − 5. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9668.2021.04.001 [37] 许贺, 曲洪建, 蔡建忠. 网络直播对服装消费者购买意愿的影响[J] . 北京服装学院学报(自然科学版),2020,40(2):88 − 94. [38] 林婷婷, 曲洪建. 网红营销要素对服装消费者购买意愿的影响[J] . 丝绸,2019,56(3):54 − 62. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7003.2019.03.009 [39] MEYERSLEVY J. The influence of sex roles on judgment[J] . Journal of Consumer Research,1988,14(4):522 − 530. doi: 10.1086/209133 [40] GUTHRIE M, KIM H S, JUNG J. The effects of facial image and cosmetic usage on perceptions of brand personality[J] . Journal of Fashion Marketing & Management,2008,12(2):164 − 181. [41] LANG C, ARMSTRONG C M, BRANNON L A. Drivers of clothing disposal in the US: An exploration of the role of personal attributes and behaviours in frequent disposal[J] . International IJC,2013,37(6):706 − 714. [42] STOKBURGER N E, TEICHMANN K. Is luxury just a female thing? The role of gender in luxury brand consumption[J] . Journal of Business Research,2013,66(7):889 − 896. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.12.007