Research on incentive mechanism under multi-demand-side cooperation in logistics service supply chain
-
摘要: 基于共同代理理论,分别构建序次合作机制和同盟合作机制下的激励模型,并进行仿真分析. 研究表明,序次合作机制下,物流服务需求方序次与物流服务集成商签约,先与物流服务集成商签约的一方容易处于不利地位. 同盟合作机制下,物流服务需求方统一与物流服务集成商签约,物流服务集成商提供的最优努力水平的上限要高于序次合作机制下其提供的最优努力水平的上限.Abstract: Based on the theory of common agency, incentive models for sequential cooperation mechanisms and alliance cooperation mechanisms were constructed, and simulation analysis was conducted. Research result show that under the sequential cooperation mechanism, the logistics service demander signs contracts with the logistics service integrator, and the party who signs with the logistics service integrator first is likely to be at a disadvantage. Under the alliance cooperation mechanism, logistics service demanders sign contracts with logistics service integrators, and the upper limit of the optimal effort level provided by logistics service integrators is higher than the upper limit of the optimal effort level provided by them under the sequential cooperation mechanism.
-
表 1 情形1下参数设置
Table 1. Parameter setting for case 1
参数 数值 $ {x}_{1} $ 1 $ {x}_{2} $ 0.5 $ {\sigma }_{1}^{2} $ 1.3 $ {\sigma }_{2}^{2} $ 1.5 k 0.4 ρ 1 $ \gamma $ [−1,1] 表 2 情形2下参数设置
Table 2. Parameter setting for case 2
参数 数值 $ {x}_{1} $ 1 $ {x}_{2} $ 1.5 $ {\sigma }_{1}^{2} $ 1.3 $ {\sigma }_{2}^{2} $ 1.1 k 0.4 ρ 1 $ \gamma $ [−1,1] 表 3 参数设置
Table 3. Parameter setting
参数 数值 $ {x}_{1} $ 1 $ {x}_{2} $ [0.5,1.5] $ {\sigma }_{1}^{2} $ 1.3 $ {\sigma }_{2}^{2} $ 1.3 k 0.4 ρ 1 $ \gamma $ [-1,1] -
[1] 何黎明. 党的十八大以来我国现代物流发展成就[J] . 中国物流与采购,2022,18:12 − 15. doi: 10.16079/j.cnki.issn1671-6663.2022.18.017. [2] 张维迎. 博弈论与信息经济学[M]. 上海: 上海三联书店, 上海人民出版社, 1996. [3] MIRRLEES J. The optimal structure of authority and incentives within an organization[J] . Bell Journal of Economics,1976,7(2):105 − 131. [4] HOLMSTROM B, MILGROM P. Aggregation and linearity in the provision of intertemporal incentives[J] . Econometrica,1987,55(2):303 − 328. [5] BERNHEIM B D, WHINSTON M D. Common agency[J] . Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society,1986:923 − 942. [6] BERNHEIM B D, WHINSTON M D. Common marketing agency as a device for facilitating collusion[J] . The RAND Journal of Economics,1985:269 − 281. [7] LAFFONT J, MARTIMORT D. Transaction costs, institutional design and the separation of powers[J] . European Economic Review,1998(42):673 − 684. [8] KIM K, YOO S, CHOI K. Information asymmetry among multiple principals and inefficiency within the organization[J] . Sustainability,2019,11(24):1 − 14. [9] 李杰. 委托监理机构从事工程保险技术服务的机制分析[J] . 保险研究,2009(1):66 − 69. doi: 10.13497/j.cnki.is.2009.01.010 [10] 刘靓晨. 闭环供应链委托代理激励机制设计研究[J] . 商业研究,2016(06):156 − 169. [11] 朱天宇. 基于共同代理理论的产学研合作研究[D].上海: 上海交通大学, 2010. [12] 戴盼倩, 姚冠新, 徐静, 等. 城乡双向物流模式下的物流服务商激励机制设计[J] . 工业工程与管理,2019,24(4):31 − 39. [13] 李晨阳. 基于委托代理理论的物流服务供应链激励机制研究[D]. 上海: 上海工程技术大学, 2021.